Killing Fish for Fun Instead of Food - Shooting The Breeze


Hi, and welcome to my "Editor's Blog"! In this space I'll be attempting to keep our readers informed on fast-breaking news and issues affecting our islands. Visit often. There's a lot going on!

Enjoy the Island Free Press and, even more importantly, enjoy our wonderful barrier island!!!




Latest Comments

J. Albrecht (The Rules of the …): This is going to be a horrible disaster!
Devidog (Are There More Ri…): Last parting gift concerning the recently departed Redfin/Billfish/Pussycat, promise! In yet anothe…
Salvo Jimmy (The Rules of the …): The enforcement of not allowing golf carts to cross NC 12 will be interesting to watch. For decades …
bbc (The Rules of the …): with the way visitors and locals alike speed through buxton both on 12 and the back road, this is a …
Steve (Could pathways, t…): Yes Hondo7, the outer banks do end at the bridge. Then begins the barrier island system. After all w…
NRO asking for a … (Could pathways, t…): Will the pathway make it up to the community center?


Powered by PivotX - 2.3.11 
XML: RSS Feed 
XML: Atom Feed 

Waitin' On A Woman | Home | Going To A (TEA) Part…

Killing Fish for Fun Instead of Food

Wednesday 08 April 2009 at 8:35 pm. I hope all of you will read Susan West’s article on the Fishing Page about the bill recently introduced into the North Carolina General Assembly to give coastal gamefish status to red drum and spotted sea trout, also known as speckled trout.

West writes:

Red drum and spotted sea trout would be off-limits to commercial harvest in North Carolina if a bill introduced March 31 becomes law…House Bill 918, Designation of Coastal Game Fish, would prohibit the sale and purchase of the species and prohibit the use of nets to catch the fish.

In other words, commercial fishermen working for a living would no longer be able to catch and sell these fish. They would become the private resource of recreational fishermen who fish for the fun of it.

It also means that unless you are a recreational fisherman with access to the resource, you will no longer be able to buy drum or speckled trout in a fish market or order it in a restaurant. I hope all of you understand what an outrageous proposal this is.

The group behind this bill, the Coastal Fisheries Reform Group, which represents itself as a grassroots reform organization, would like us to think that it is “protecting” marine resources with this power grab.

This is from the group’s Web site:

Prompted by the welfare of the resource, we are subsequently forced to intervene through the avenue available to us through our North Carolina General Assembly by introducing a bill that would declare the Spotted Sea Trout and the Red Drum as Game Fish.

The bill is also supported by the Coastal Conservation Association of North Carolina, which also is selling this move as a measure to conserve the resource.

If you believe that this group is prompted by the “welfare of the resource,” then you must also believe that the beaches on Hatteras and Ocracoke should be closed to ORVs to “protect the resources.”

The Coastal Fisheries Reform Group’s secondary justification is that commercial fishermen just don’t kill as many of these fish as the recreational fishermen do, so the income from drum and speckled trout for the commercial guys is a drop in the bucket.

The “reform” group does note that it favors compensating the commercial fishermen for their loss by giving them their own “stimulus package.” Susan West writes that HB 918 authorizes the state fisheries commission to pay commercial fishermen for lost income, using up to $1 million from the Marine Resources Fund, the fund for revenue from recreational fishing license sales.

And, finally, the group notes that recreational fishermen are worth a lot more money to the state’s economy than the commercial fishermen -- never mind that commercial fishing is a time-honored occupation in our coastal communities and an integral part of our historic and cultural heritage.

But, hey, the guys who fish for fun will bring in more money – while they help conserve the resources.

This is not only a ridiculous argument, but a real affront to commercial fishermen who have been struggling with increased regulation, higher prices for gas, and other problems. Now the economy is really bad and we should kick them again while they are down?

If the commercial catch of drum and spotted sea trout is such a small percentage of landings, then why can’t the commercial folks keep their meager catch?

According to Susan West, 25 commercial fishermen on Hatteras will be affected if these fish are reserved for recreational fishermen only. That is 25 families with reduced income. It may be a small reduction, but commercial fishing families are already living on the edge.

While I was doing some research on this topic, I came across a guest column that Ernie Foster, who runs the Albatross Fleet of charter boats in Hatteras village, wrote for The Island Free Press in October of 2007 when President George W. Bush declared striped bass and red drum as gamefish in federal waters.

I couldn’t express my astonishment and outrage on this issue any more eloquently than Ernie did in 2007.

“According to an article in The Washington Post,” Ernie wrote in 2007, “the executive director of Maryland’s CCA, Robert Glenn, believes that striped bass are too valuable to be ‘plundered for commercial sale.’ Killing for fun is good. Feeding others within highly controlled harvest restrictions is bad. Go figure.’

His column continues:

As you look up and down the coast, from Maine to Key West, in every marina you see boats, boats, and more boats. Most are pleasure craft. Does anyone believe that people are buying such expensive toys, with their discretionary dollars, because they are not having fun? And yet, the notion prevails that we must get rid of professional fishermen so that we will have even more fun.

Even more fun? We are already having fun, folks. Otherwise, we would not be spending our money on the charters, the boats, and the tackle. Do we really need to wipe out fellow citizens financially, socially and geographically so that we can have even more fun? I was taught a lot of lessons growing up in Hatteras, going to public schools, and at the university. Choosing even more fun over the welfare of my fellow citizens was not one of them.

How have we come to this point, this place, where it has become public policy to prevent our professional fishermen from providing a product to the American consumer? What is driving politicians to approve policy and regulations that eliminate a significant part of our coastal heritage and that eliminate independent businessmen from taking care of themselves and their families? Have we, as a nation, come to believe that all seafood must be imported, unless you are one of the approximately 3 percent of American citizens who personally fish in saltwater? How elitist is a national policy that bars all but 3 percent of our citizens from acquiring an abundant, nationally controlled, natural resource?

If you want to read the full text of Ernie’s excellent column, go to:

And please remember that you can support both recreational and commercial fishing and their related industries on the island. It doesn’t have to be – and should not be -- one or the other.

five comments

<span class='registered'>dannycouch</span>

Kind of challenging to surf fish for drum and trout when you can’t access the inlets or the points during prime fishing months. Many boaters should be required to take safety education. How long before we have a scenario like the football players in the Gulf of Mexico? Fairly docile waters there compared to crossing Hatteras Bar. The assault on history and heritage here is shameful. Commercial fishing got us the quality of life and visitor experience we’re blessed with today. Thank a commercial waterman and his family for your American heritage.

dannycouch - 09-04-’09 09:04
<span class='registered'>drmikeberry</span>

Whatever happened to the concept of equity and due process? Where were the public hearings on this bill? Again, we have another piece of special interest/elitists legislation moved along in the shadows disguised as “resource protection.” Where is there a science based assessment or analysis that indicates we cannot have both recreational and commercial fishing?

drmikeberry - 09-04-’09 13:49
<span class='registered'>OBXTraveler</span>

I am very disappointed at the apparent lack of interest by readers in posting their opinions here on Irene’s blog. I am almost certain that many more people are routinely reading the Island Free Press and Irene’s blog than are represented here by these very few reader comments I see since this blog started. There are many critical issues facing the Outer Banks right now; issues that could permanently shape the daily lives of the people of the Outer Banks for years to come.

Do the majority of readers not have an opinion? Do they not care about these important issues? Are they just plain too lazy to take the time and effort to post? I certainly hope this is not the case.

Irene has taken the time and effort to provide a wonderful public forum here for discussion and debate. Discussion and debate are important parts of the democratic process. Please do not assume you are not an important part of that process. If you have a thought, opinion, or comment please make the effort to let your voice be heard. I am eager to hear what you have to say.

OBXTraveler - 16-04-’09 10:58
<span class='registered'>frankandfran</span>

Folks, read between the lines on this bill! If it were to pass, God forbid, it would only be a short time until the pictures of a net with a trout or reddrum began being circulated on the internet and elsewhere with the comment. “We can’t allow this terrible waste continue, the nets must go!” This is the goal behind the effort to make speckled trout and reddrum sportfish only. Don’t fall for their statements of science taken out of text that mis-represent what I believe is one if not the best marine fishery management of any state on the atlantic.Many of the plans implimented in NC are so well received by the National Marine Fisheries that the plans are used coast wide. Our commercial trip ticket reports, recreational surveys, etc. are just a few the better guage fishing efforts on our fish stocks so if measures are needed to reduce the efforts they can be instituted. Let’s stand with our commercial fishing community and make this bill go away.

frankandfran - 19-04-’09 16:48

Hello, I enjoy reading your ost.

Hello (URL) - 01-04-’12 18:43

(optional field)
(optional field)

Comment moderation is enabled on this site. This means that your comment will not be visible until it has been approved by an editor.

Remember personal info?
Small print: All html tags except <b> and <i> will be removed from your comment. You can make links by just typing the url or mail-address.